FRYER INSTITUTE
GENEVA ACT OF THE HAGUE AGREEMENT
INFORMATION CENTER
GENEVA ACT (1999) OF THE HAGUE AGREEMENT
CONCERNING THE INTERNATIONAL
REGISTRATION OF INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS
(GENEVA ACT)
A NEW WAY FOR U. S. DESIGN OWNERS
TO OBTAIN
FOREIGN DESIGN PROTECTION
William T. Fryer, III
Patent Attorney
Professor, University of Baltimore School of Law
Copyright 2006
October 14, 2006
This article was published as a part of the annual meeting of the American Patent Law Association, Industrial Designs Committee, held October 19, 2006 (updated and edited to fit web site format). Ms. Patricia McQueeney, Committee Chair, organized and moderated the meeting, where the Geneva Act was discussed. The article lays a foundation for understanding the Geneva Act of the Hague Agreement for the International Registration of Industrial Designs (Geneva Act).
This introduction to a new way for foreign protection of industrial designs, the Geneva Act of the Hague Agreement - is serious reading. It will be helpful to read this article before discussions in companies and law firms on whether to support U. S. ratification of the Geneva Act.
This article presents the main Geneva Act operational concepts, in short form, and then it provides a glossary of several key terms organized in a unique format. There are many special topics that could be address in more detail. Questions and comments are encourage, to suggest what topics should be addressed in later articles.
Other resources on the Geneva Act included the WIPO web site pages on
the Hague Agreement System, at URL http://www.wipo.int/hague/en/,
and a recent book, The Geneva Act (1999) of the Hague Agreement Concerning
the International Registration of Industrial Designs, Drafting History
and Analysis, by William T. Fryer III (2005), published by Kluwer Law International,
and availabe on the Internet, e. g., from Amazon.com.
OPERATIONAL CONCEPTS OF THE GENEVA ACT
1. The Concept of an International Treaty to Establish Design Protection
in Member Countries or Regions
Most countries and some regional organizations have industrial design
protection laws, either using design patents or design registrations. Access
to these systems is by directly filing an application with the design office
through a foreign associate. The Geneva Act provides an alternative to
direct filing, to obtain foreign design protection.
2. The Concept of an International Registration
The Geneva Act permits the use of a single application form to apply
for protection in member countries through an International Registration.
3. The Concept of an International Office
The Geneva Act sets up a central administration under the direction
of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). This office receives
the International Registration application, only reviews the application
contents for formality compliance, and registers the completed application.
It publishes or defers publication of the design for a limited time in
certain situations. After publication, the International Registration is
sent to the designated member national office, to determine what rights
may be obtained.
4. The Concept of the International Registration Using the
National Laws and Procedures of a Member Country or Region
The Geneva Act provides that the International Registration is processed
under the procedures of that apply to national or regional design application,
and that the rights obtained for the International Registration are determined
by national or regional laws, within certain limits.
5. The Concept of Using the National or Regional Offices to
Initially File the International Registration Application
The Geneva Act provides for the option of a member to permit filing
the International Registration application in their design office, to forward
the application to WIPO for processing.
W. T. Fryer, III
Copyright 2006
GLOSSARY OF TERMS OF THE GENEVA ACT
1. Hague Agreement
The Hague Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Industrial
Designs is a treaty that originated in 1925 and went through several updates,
and now it has the latest version, the Geneva Act, approved in 1999. Earlier
treaty versions remain active for members of those treaties, but the latest
version is the one that new and old members join. The treaties, as a group,
are referred to as the Hague System.
2. Geneva Act
This treaty version became operational on April 1, 2004. It has 20
members as of December 7, 2006 (See Topic: Geneva
Act Membership). The treaty Rules and Administrative Instructions unify
many formalities and fees. The most recent updates on Geneva Act membership
can be found on the WIPO Hague System web site at
http://www.wipo.int/hague/en/.
WIPO administers several versions of the Hague Agreement, collectively
administered under the title "Hague System." The Geneva Act is the
current version and the only version that members can join now.
3. International Registration
The International Registration application requirements include a reproduction
of the design and information on the applicant. This application form is
accepted by all treaty members. It can be prepared in English or French.
4. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)
WIPO administers the Geneva Act, receiving the International registration
applications, reviewing them only to see that the required contents are
present, and then approving the International Registration. The International
Registration is published and sent to the design offices of all members
designated for protection. Most fees are paid to WIPO (Swiss currency).
WIPO maintains the status of all International Registrations and handles
the renewals.
5. National and Regional Design Offices
The receipt of an International Registration by a national or regional
design office starts the design office review. The processing of an International
Registration and the rights obtain thereunder are governed by the laws
applicable to the designated national or regional office. In countries
that do not have novelty examination, the next step comes relatively soon,
and the International registration protection is approved. Sometimes the
date of protection is from the date of the Integration Registration, its
filing date with WIPO.
6. Novelty Examination
A few countries, like the U. S. and Japan, require novelty examination
before rights are obtained. The Geneva Act accommodates the non-novelty
examination systems and the novelty examination systems, putting emphasis
on prompt examination and rights.
7. Publication Deferment
In most national and regional systems there have been an options for
limited term publication deferment. This step gave the design owner the
right to prevent copying of a published International Registration design
before the design product was public. The Geneva Act limits whether this
step can be used, at the option of the treaty member. The maximum period
of deferment is 30 months.
8. Design Reproductions
An International Registration requirement for a design reproduction
is flexible, on most aspects, allowing the attorney to provide the drawings
or photos that provide the best protection for the designated member design
systems. The different drawing requirements, for example, in many countries
make it important to continue to work for harmonization of design laws
and procedures, through meetings of the Geneva Act member. These differences
are not an obstacle to practical use now of the Geneva Act.
9. Protection Term
International Registration protection term is determined by the national
or regional laws of the designated country, with a minimum of 15 years.
10. Multiple Designs International Registration
An International registration can include up to 100 designs for products
in the same class of the industrial design classification Locarno treaty.
The procedures in most countries that do not have novelty examination result
in acceptance of the multiple designs application without modification
and rights are obtained relatively soon.
11. Costs
Most fees for an International Registration filing, renewal and other
administrative matters are set by the Geneva Act governing body. National
and regional offices can set the fees for novelty examination. A design
owner will receive a significant cost saving for filing a multiple designs
International Registration application.
12. Representation
The Geneva Act permits design owners to file an International Registration
application directly with WIPO, and to handle the communications with WIPO,
without help from a U. S. Attorney or agent. A U. S. company could use
its in-house attorneys to obtain an International Registration. In practice,
as with all areas of IP, it is prudent to obtain advice from an expert
in the field of U. S. and foreign design protection. A foreign attorney
is not required to file or communicate with WIPO on International Registration
matters. The GA is set up to allow an attorney or agent to represent the
design owner. National and regional laws will determine whether a foreign
attorney is needed to communicate with a design office on rejection of
International Registration protection, and other International Registration
matters.
13. Two-dimensional Designs
Registration under the Geneva Act of a two-dimensional design, such
as a textile design, is given special flexibility, partly in view of the
TRIPS general requirement to facilitate lower cost and efficient protection
of textile designs. The filing fees for textile International Registration
application are initially lower than for three-dimensional designs.
14. Direct National or Regional Filing
Design protection can be obtain in each country or region by filing
directly with the design office. A national attorney is needed to file
the application and to communicate with the design office. The application
must be in one of the accepted local languages and drawings must be in
the format required by local rules. Fees must be paid in local currency.
A design owner has options on how to obtain foreign protection, either
direct filing or The New Way, using the Geneva Act. The selection of countries
where a Geneva Act application will provide the needed protection will
be an important step in foreign design protection planning. An experienced
design attorney will be a valuable source of advice in this planning.
W. T. Fryer, III
Copyright 2006
END OF DOCUMENT
GENEVA ACT INFORMATION CENTER HOME
This page was last updated on December 7, 2006